Ma voi avete capito qual è il motivo formale per cui è finito in galera? Ecco la storia surreale di una violenza sessuale mai avvenuta, di un profilattico rotto e di un’accusa che proprio non sta in piedi.
The Italian Foreign Minister Frattini, accepting with joy the news of Julian Assange, was let go in a sentence too: "It was time, luckily the international siege has been successful." Admission, not too implied that sexual matters for which the founder of Wikileaks is finished in a prison in London are just an excuse, and that the founder of Wikileaks is in for what your site has revealed in recent days.
is therefore worthwhile to see what is the story of the crazy 'rape' that, formally, Assange has been arrested in London in recent days after Interpol had issued a warrant against Julian Assange for 'sex crimes'. In fact, technically, what is emerging is that the founder of Wikileaks was arrested for violating a Swedish law that, in a broad interpretation, comes to punish anyone who commits any form of sexual acts on scorretteza also consensual. But first things first.
As reported by the American weekly Newsweek in August 2010, to give birth to the 'case' against the Swedish justice Assange was a Swedish lawyer, named Claes Borgstrom (study Borgstrom and Bostrom, Stockholm) representing two women whose returns have led the investigation against mr. Wikileaks for 'conduct sexual misconduct '. The customers of Borgstrom (we'll call, as did the international media, A and B) have both indicated that they had sexual relations with Assange last August, during his stay in the Swedish capital entitled "War and the role of the media", organized from Brotherhood Movement, a Christian group linked to the social democratic party. Both were reported to the police's reluctance to use condoms Assange and accuse him of not wanting to undergo following reports, as per their request, on a test that would exclude sexually transmitted diseases.
statements of the two women have brought the issue - and then the rapid cancellation - The charge of rape, and subsequent parallel investigation for alleged 'harassment'. The Guardian has published a detailed chronological account of the alleged sexual encounters with women A and B, that in both cases would be initiated by consensus but would then include both what the second would be "non-consensual sex" for refusing to use Assange condoms.
is how the British Daily Mail tells the story: "When (Assange and woman) came back from dinner, they had a sexual relationship, but there was a problem with the condom. It was broken. The woman believed that Assange had done it on purpose, but he argued that it was an accident. In any case, the next day, during the conference, A. appeared relaxed and calm. During the same conference had met the woman Assange B, another very pretty blonde, younger woman's A. B admits the woman tried to involve his hero in a conversation. Assange seemed pleased to have such an ardent admirer and, says B, looked at 'any time'. The Daily Mail reports that, according to a source close to the Swedish police, during sexual intercourse after the woman of their knowledge B. he insisted Assange to use condoms, but the next morning the two would have had unprotected sex. This, according to the Daily Mail "has been the basis for the charge of rape. However, the morning after the event the woman B. was quite happy to go down to buy breakfast for Assange.
In essence, the charges against the two women have been sexually Assange unfair for not having used a condom were not immediate: only several days after the reports, the two women have found that the behavior could be criminally Assange prosecution. In this sense, the two women would be decisive Assange refusal to take the exam to get AIDS, they have requested. The former lawyer
Assange - James D. Catlin - confirmed that the allegations relate to the Swedish sex protected and noted that "the consent of the two women to have sex with Assange was confirmed by the prosecution." According to Catlin, the Swedish justice system is "built around gradually." The current attorney Assange in London, Mark Stephens, instead told a news that Assange AOL is not accused of rape, but of a crime called "surprise sex" which usually involves a fine of 5,000 crowns, or about $ 715 . "We do not know what exactly is 'surprise sex', and do not have it explained," says Stephens, said he felt "like I was in a surreal movie."
The Swedish justice, according to the attorney Assange "has not even asked to see Julian or to question him. We have not received a summons with a charge states, but only a request to act as a witness. " Also according to Stephens, reports Reuters, Interpol has not issued even a real arrest warrant, but only a 'red notice', or an alert to monitor the movement of international Assange. Interpol on the site, however, the name of Assange is over in recent days among those most wanted for sexual offenses ('sex crimes') with photos and date of birth.
Until the publication of "cable" U.S., Interpol had not issued any 'red notice' or the name of Assange had published on its website, despite the request of the Swedish judiciary date back to late August. In short, something happened then, in defiance of every rule of law. Frattini has called it, in fact, "international encirclement '.
http://skywalkerboh.blogspot.com/2010/12/julian-assange-non-era-stupro-non-cera.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment